spacer


Title - The UK Surface Analysis Forum Newsletter

        
Navigation Bar Navigation Bar


bar
  

"Data Interchange and Developments in Process
Illustrated by Peak Synthesis Analysis:
Do you need anything else?"

Dr. Martin Seah, NPL, Teddington

Dr Seah showed some recent research from NPL, on the accuracy of commercial software used for peak synthesis in XPS. The work has been made possible due to the development of the VAMAS data transfer format. The work focussed on the following experiments on a set of synthetic spectra:
 
Gaussian-Lorentzian sum or product function peaks
 
Effectiveness of Shirley background subtraction
 
Effectiveness of Tougaard background substraction
 
Peak synthesis with partially resolved peaks with no background, &
 
 
  Comparison of peak fitting
 

Figure 1:
Comparison of peak fitting results generated by  different software packages

    

Synthetic spectra approximating the C 1s peaks for poly(methyl methacrylate), poly (vinyl acetate), poly (vinyl chloride) and poly (isobutylene) allowed the analysis of the accuracy of the data when the spectra were processed using the different manufacturers software. One set of spectra was constructed with Gauss-Lorentzian product function peaks and the second with Gauss-Lorentzian sum function peaks, since each software package was designed for analysing only one of these options.

The fitting of individual peaks is only good for with the software using the same peak shapes as those of the data. The fit quality will deteriorate markedly for fitting a shape different to that used in the peak-fitting algorithm. For unresolved peaks additional information is required to provide meaningful intensity information. The results obtained from the three commercial systems are shown below in a graph of error and their standard deviation for the peak intensities versus the percentage error in the peak intensities.

The three software packages studied all have different facilities but from the analysis of the data, that the general order of preference in the fittings algorithms was:

B, A & C

Other aspects of the software packages can favour software package A, which had a higher level of functionality. For more details see the following paper:

Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 95(1998)71
  

< Previous | Index | Next >

 

bar

Navigation Bar Navigation Bar

bar

Last updated 24 February, 2001

Simon Morton
Advanced Light Source
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
Berkeley
CA 94720

Comments or enquiries to S.Morton@uksaf.org

bar
© UK Surface Analysis Forum 1998