spacer


Title - The UK Surface Analysis Forum Newsletter

        
Navigation Bar Navigation Bar


bar

 

Surface Analysis Forum Newsletter No. 23

Autumn 1997

bar

Contents

Announcement of the forthcomming January Meeting of the Surface Analysis Forum

"Nano-Analysis"

Interface Analysis Centre, Bristol University
Wednesday 7th January 1998

bar

Report on the summer meeting of the Surface Analysis Forum

"Fine Tuning Your Data"
Daresbury Laboratory, Wednesday 9th July 1997

Including summaries of the invited lectures:-

The Daresbury Facility: What does it give you that nothing else can?
Prof. Peter Weightman, IRC in Surface Science, Liverpool University

Surface Science on Beamline 4
V. R. Dhanak, IRC in Surface Science-LiverpoolUniversity

Squeezing Extra Information out of Phosphorus L XANES
Dr. T Gaunlett, Shell, Thornton Research Centre,

Spin Polarised Photoelectron Spectroscopy: what is it, and what information does it give us
Dr. E Seddon, Daresbury Laboratory, VUV Spectroscopy Group

EXAFS: what can it tell us about real samples
L.M. Murphy X-ray Spectroscopy Group, Daresbury Laboratory

The Origin and Practical Application of Auger Fine Structure
Prof. Peter Weightman, IRC in Surface Science-Liverpool University

The SRS: How the light source works
Dr. H. Owen, Accelerator Physics Groups, Daresbury Laboratory

The Daresbury Analytical Research and Technology Service (DARTS)
Dr. Steve Maginn, CCLRC Daresbury Lab, Warrington, UK

bar

1997 Surface Analysis Forum AGM

bar

Announcement of the forthcomming January Meeting of the Surface Analysis Forum

"Nano-Analysis"

Interface Analysis Centre, Bristol University
Wednesday 7th January 1998

The User Group meeting at Bristol will focus on the high spatial resolution surface chemical analysis of materials. The meeting will be split into two sections, the morning session will be a series of lectures on the application of the methods of analyis, whilst the afternoon session will be a series of practical workshops. The workshops will be conducted at the main lecture theatre and at Oldbury House (IAC).

The committee would be delighted to receive contributed papers from members or others, who have results that they would be prepared to share in this public forum. The papers should be approximately 20 minutes in duration. The committee would be particularly interested in papers submitted by post-graduate students, although all submissions will be considered on their merits for the meeting in Bristol. Interesting samples for the afternoon workshop will also be considered provided they are supplied WELL in advance of the meeting.

Please contact Dr Steve Harris (steve.harris@src.bae.co.uk) for more information.

bar

"Fine Tuning Your Data"

Daresbury-Wednesday 9th July 1997

The meeting at Daresbury was opened by Dr. RK Wild from the IAC-Bristol, Dr. MP Seah from NPL was the chairman for the morning session, Dr. S Evans from the University of Wales chaired the afternoon session. The first paper was given by Prof. Peter Weightman, from the IRC in Surface Science at Liverpool University, and was titled:

bar

The Daresbury Facility: What does it give you that nothing else can?

Prof. Peter Weightman, IRC in Surface Science-Liverpool University

In answer to the question in the title, the Daresbury facilities offer Electron Spectroscopy with;

  1. lots of photons
  2. tunable photons
  3. polarised photons, plus complimentary information on;
  4. Electronic Structure, X-ray absorption, NEXAFS
  5. Physical Structure, X-ray Diffraction
  6. Topography

    EXAFS, SEXAFS

  7. Femtosecond monitoring of reactions

However, what doesn’t it give you that something else can? Photoelectron Spectroscopy with;

  1. high sensitivity &
  2. high resolution &
  3. high energy photons

Where the "something else" is a laboratory XPS instrument. In the view of the author, the most impressive experiments using synchrotton radiation are structural characterisations of complex biological systems such as viruses. Also impressive, but less complex are the structural studies on the crystalisation of polymers.

Moving to electron spectroscopy, the tunability of the low energy photons provided by the synchrotron to band map the valence electronic structure of solids. The tunable low energy photons can be used to exploit the Cooper minimum that occurs in the photoelectron crossections of orbitals that have nodes such as the 4d levels of Pd. By exploiting this characteristic it has been possible to separate out the the contribution of the copper and palladium atoms to the conduction band density of states in the CuPd alloys. EXAFS can also be used on the same systems, given detailed information on there physical structure, quickly and relatively easily.

However, in the authors opinion, the real use of synchrotron radiation, is to measure weak Auger transitions, with a good signal to noise!!! In such situations the signal to noise is essentially determined by the background and in certain circumstances the optimum experiments are performed using a tunable high energy photon source. This is demonstrated by a study1 of a monolayer of Sb "delta doped" 40Å below the surface of Si and by recent studies of 1% of monolayer of Si 50Å below the surface of GaAs. A provocative interpretation of the latter work is that it shows the potential of synchrotron radiation for the study of processes occurring on a femtosecond timescale with an accuracy in excess of that obtained with current laser technology.

References

  1. "Donor activation and electronic screening at an antimony d layer in silicon" JMC Thornton, RJ Cole, DJ Gravesteijn and P Weightman, Phys. Rev. B 54 7972-8 (1996)

Prof. P Weightman
email peterw@is.ssci.liv.ac.uk

bar

Surface Science on Beamline 4

V. R. Dhanak, IRC in Surface Science-LiverpoolUniversity

The IRC beamline 4 consists of two branchlines, BL4.1 and BL4.2. Beamline 4.1 provides photons in the VUV range 15 - 200 eV using a SGM. The beamline and its capability is briefly described. The performance is illustrated using two different surface science studies: SCLS measurements to probe rare earth overlayers on the W(110) surface and photoemission studies of metals on TiO2 surfaces. Beamline 4.2 provides photons in the soft X-ray range (1500 - 10000 eV) using a double crystal monochromator. The performance of this beamline is described using two absorption experiments as examples: adsorption of metals on quartz which is difficult to study using conventional ESCA, and polymerisation of thiophene on Fe2O3.

Dr. V R Dhanak,
e-mail: vin@ssci.liv.ac.uk

bar

Squeezing Extra Information out of Phosphorus L XANES

Dr. T Gaunlett, Shell, Thornton Research Centre,

Recently, claims have been made regarding the power of X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure (XANES)1 at the phosphorus L2,3 absorption edges as a technique for the examination of polymeric phosphates2,3. XANES spectra at the phosphorus L2,3 edges have much more fine structure, which is related to the symmetry of the absorbing atom, than corresponding P 2p photoelectron spectra. The intensities of the lowest spin orbit doublet bands in the XANES spectrum at the phosphorus L edges of sodium phosphate glasses correlate well with the average chain lengths measured by end group titration2. These bands are due to the 2p3/2*a1* and 2p1/2*a1* transitions at phosphorus. They become more intense as the phosphate polymer chain lengthens, tetrahedral symmetry is broken and the fraction of d orbital character in the upper state increases2. This assumption can only hold if there is no further distortion of the co-ordination around the phosphorus atoms due to interactions of the phosphate oxygens with counter ions. There is, however, a further aspect of the XANES, which can be used as a structural fingerprint4,5 and is applied to the near edge in transmission Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy6. The energy difference between the shape resonance and the absorption edge step is related simply to the distance of the first co-ordination shell from the absorbing atom4,5. By utilising both the magnitude of this energy difference and the 2p3/2*a1* band intensity we are better able to separate structural features of phosphate polymers. As P-O bond lengthening due to interactions between phosphate oxygen and the associated cation can break the symmetry at phosphorus, a study was made of calcium, iron and magnesium phosphates to assess whether a cation effect could be detected.

References

  1. P J Durham in "X-Ray Absorption. Principles, Applications, Techniques of EXAFS, SEXAFS and XANES," (eds. D C Koningsberger & R Prins), Wiley-Interscience, 1988.
  2. Z Yin, M Kasrai & G M Bancroft, "X-Ray Absorption spectroscopic studies of sodium polyphosphate glasses,"Phys Rev B, 1995, 51, 742-750.
  3. M Kasrai, M Fuller, M Scaini, Z Yin, R W Brunner, G M Bancroft, M E Fleet, K Fyfe & K H Tan, "Studies of tribochemical film formation using X-Ray absorption and photoelectron spectroscopies," Proc 21st Leeds-Lyon Conference on Tribology, Elsevier 1995.
  4. A Bianconi, "EXAFS for Inorganic Systems, Daresbury Study Weekend 28 29 March 1981, DL/SCI/R17, CLRC Daresbury Laboratory.
  5. A Bianconi, M Dell'Ariccia, A Gargano, & C R Natoli, Springer Ser. Chem. Phys. 1983, 27 (EXAFS Near Edge Struct.), 57-61.
  6. R Brydson, EMSA Bulletin 1991, 21, 57-67.

Dr. Trevor Gauntlett
j.t.gauntlett@msmail.trctho.simis.com

bar

"Spin Polarised Photoelectron Spectroscopy: what is it, and what information does it give us?"

Dr. E Seddon, Daresbury Laboratory, VUV Spectroscopy Group

Dr Seddon defined the basic construction and design of the various types of spin polarized photoelectron spectrometers. The technique can be used effectively on "real samples", several multi-element examples were shown, including thin films of chromium on iron, and the oxidation of this system. The technique measures asymmetry between two backscattered detectors, and a simple expression is applied to the data to extract polarisation information. However, since only backscattered electrons are used, the technique has very low sensitivity, for every 10,000 electrons entering the analyser only 1 is detected. This minor disadvantage aside, the main advantages and disadvantages of the technique are as follows:

+Ve
Element specific
Oxidation state specific
Analysis surface or bulk
Local magnetic order can be studied

-Ve
No orbital information
Indirect method of analysis
Low sensitivity, really requires a very bright source

However, the technique does have clear advantages over standard photoelectron spectroscopy with regards to the analysis of local magnetic order in thin films.

Dr. E Seddon
E.A.Seddon@dl.ac.uk

bar

EXAFS: what can it tell us about real samples

L.M. Murphy X-ray Spectroscopy Group, Daresbury Laboratory

Extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) is a technique which can determine the detailed local environment surrounding an excited atom. The advantages of the technique are as follows:
  
element spectrum
geometrical content
valence information
in-situ experiment

However, the disadvantages are the following:
 
multi site structure leads to analytical problems
the analysis is NOT always routine

There are now several different types of basic EXAFS experiments, such as transmission, fluorescence, reflection and surface specific. It is possible to do simultaneous EXAFS and diffraction experiments, combining both sets of data to solve the problems associated with a given sample.

Further information on EXAFS can be found:

  1. http://srs.dl.ac.uk/XRS/index.html
  2. S.J. Gurman. J. Synchrotron Radiation 1995, Vol 2, pp 56-63.

Dr. LM Murphy
L.M.Murphy@dl.ac.uk

bar

"The Origin and Practical Application of Auger Fine Structure"

Prof. Peter Weightman, IRC in Surface Science-Liverpool University

Origin

Fine structure arises from states that can arise from different ways of coupling the spin and angular momentum of electrons in unfilled atomic subshells. These states are called TERMS and are cjaracterised by values of S,L and J quantum numbers describing the angular momentum of each state. Two interactions are important;

  1. Coulomb interactions,
  2. e2/r between states with described S and L quantum numbers.

  3. Spin-orbit interactions;

    x nlL.S between states with well defined J and MJ quantum numbers.

Irritation

Unfilled shells cannot be described by a basis set in which L,S,ML,MS,J and Mj are simultaneously all good quantum numbers.

Choices

  1. LS Coupling: e2/r >> x nl
  2. jj Coupling: e2/r << x nl
  3. Intermediate Coupling (IC) e2/r » x nl Whatever the coupling we need good wavefunctions!

These can be obtained from the Hartree-Fock approach to atomic structure and it is straight forward though complicated to evaluate the matrix elements that generate the splittings and intensities of the LSJ fine structure components.

A simple atomic description of fine structure applies to Auger spectra:

  1. Of free atoms.
  2. Of transitions which create final states deep in the structure of atoms. i.e. far away from the influence of molecular or solid state effects.
  3. Of transitions which create final states in otherwise filled, narrow d band systems where they are a consequence of strong electron correlation. A situation described by Cini-Sawatzky.

Practical Application of Auger Fine Structure

For transitions which create final states deep in the structure of the atom, the Auger profile will be essentially independent of chemical environment. However, the Auger energies will change with environment and these shifts can be measured accurately by using sharp features in the fine structure. The combination of Auger shifts and XPS shifts in the Auger parameter can be combined with a simple model of atomic potentials to determine ;

  1. Differences in atomic charge in the initial states in different environments.
  2. Differences in electron screening of the final state in different environments.

For transitions which create final states in otherwise filled narrow d bands the Auger fine structure depends on the ratio of the on-site electron screening U (LSJ) to the single electron band width W. Information on electron correlation.

Prof. P Weightman
Email: peterw@is.ssci.liv.ac.uk

bar

'The SRS: How the light source works'

Dr. H. Owen, Accelerator Physics Groups, Daresbury Laboratory

The Synchrotron Radiation Source produces X-rays using an electron storage ring. This talk described the basic principles of synchrotron radiation and particle accelerators, and then went on to describe the particular features and modes of the SRS facility. Emphasis was made on how the photon output as seen on a beamline is related to what is occurring within the storage ring.

Hywel Owen

h.owen@dl.ac.uk
http://accelerator.dl.ac.uk/staff/owen/

bar

"The Daresbury Analytical Research and Technology Service (DARTS)"

Dr. Steve Maginn, CCLRC Daresbury Lab, Warrington, UK

DARTS is a new initiative by CCLRC to grant easier, faster and more cost-efficient access to the benefits offered by the use of synchrotron radiation (SR) to industrial users. It has been designed to answer two perceived needs in the industrial community - firstly, for companies inexperienced in SR techniques and uses, it offers a level of consultancy and service that is tailored to meet the customer's requirements, so that they never need to become familiar with the principles or details of the practice involved; Secondly, it offers a simple raw data collection service to experienced users who see SR techniques as a routine research tool and need faster response times than has so far been available.

The presentation explained how the Service works, and how the above need are met, along with information as to which SR techniques are included in the Service and how to gain access to it.

The way in which the facility can cost the work has been changed, from a minimum of 1 day to experiments that will take less than an hour. The time is pre-allocated into the work programme, and effectively can be done by post. The turn around time is expected to be 1 month, with typical costs being £500 for the raw data from a diffraction experiment. At present not all the different Daresbury facilities are available on the DARTS scheme, but more will be made available in the near future.

Dr. S Maginn,
sjm@dl.ac.uk 

bar

1997 AGM of the UK Surface Analysis Forum

Dr. R.K. Wild opened the AGM, and gave a brief review of the year, and thanked all the speakers for their excellent presentations at the Manchester and Daresbury meetings. He felt that in general, the Users group was still very vibrant and attracting new members, but was concerned by the slight decline in numbers attending the last two meetings. The Chairman thanked the two new executive officers for their efforts, and stated that it had been a very smooth transition, and that thankfully he still had very little committee work to do since, the new secretary and treasurer were following the principles and practices of their predecessors!

Dr. Kathy England gave a brief report concerning the financial status of the group, including a curt assessment of the groups current balance sheet and income and expenditure. The Users group effectively made a loss in then financial year 1-4-96 to the 31-3-97 of £237, mainly due to the late payment of fees, see the accompanying balance sheet . This has been a continuing problem, which is why the groups policy of advanced payment of fees prior to the meeting had been re-introduced, to minimize the problems for the treasurer.

The secretary’s report was given by Dr. Steven Harris, where he highlighted the efforts of Dr. Simon Morton now from the York University, for the biggest, most popular and best surface analysis website in the world! This facility gives the UK Surface Analysis Forum a significant edge over other equivalent groups, and its popularity is due to the superb work of Dr. Morton. Dr. Harris also appealed for input from the membership for future venues and topics, particularly for the January 2000 meeting, which hopefully will be a combined ESCA Users/SIMS Users Forum meeting. The final part of the secretary’s report, was an explanation for the apparently random mailing of the meeting reports/notification of ESCA Users meeting to the members. Dr. Harris explained that the committee were trying to update the membership list, and the most effective way was to not send the mail to members who do not regularly attend meetings and see if they complain. So far over 40 "retired" members had been removed from the mail list following the adoption of this policy.

The non-executive committee positions were up for re-election, and the only members proposed for these four positions were as follows:
  
Dr. K Hallam (Proposed RK Wild, Seconded SJ Harris)
Dr. S. Morton (Proposed K England, Seconded SJ Harris)
Dr. M.P. Seah (Proposed SJ Harris, Seconded K England)
Dr. G.C. Smith (Proposed MP Seah, Seconded K Hallam)

All four were nominated, seconded and subsequently elected to serve another 2 years

  

bar

Navigation Bar Navigation Bar

bar

Last updated 24 February, 2001

Simon Morton
Advanced Light Source
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
Berkeley
CA 94720

Comments or enquiries to S.Morton@uksaf.org

bar
© UK Surface Analysis Forum 1998